Hypocracy of Seperatist Leadership

The hall mark of all separatist leadership is that of hypocrisy and do not practise what they preach. First I would take Yasin Malik who took up gun to fight for liberation of Kashmir but as an intelligent person he is he realized the futility of gun because by now he would have been inside grave if he still had gun to save his skin he adopted Gandhian philosophy of non violence . Second is Andrabi what her name is who applied for passport for her son to study abroad whereas she had appealed to all parents to boycott the school. Third is Geelani whose one leg is dangling in grave but has no qualms in sending young boys to their grave and whose sons and daughter are outside kashmir valley have not to face the bullets.

Current Crisis

As separatist or many fence sitter claims that the current crisis in Kashmir are home grown and it is without any leader but this is hard to digest. As in media they have shown how the stone throwers are or chested from behind the scene and also in media they shown interviews with stone pelters who say that they were previously earning Rs 200 per day and now they are earning Rs 1000/- per day so who is financing them? The answer to this question has to be find out by administration and also civil administration has to introspect on its failure or there should be change in civil administration from top. The kashmiri's claim that all 109 lives lost were innocent is also hard to digest did the security forces came to their house and shot them since those people were in crowd of stone thrower's who were bend on destroying public property then you don't expect police force to be onlookers see how unruly mob destroy public property. If India could achieve Independence under leadership of Mahatma Gandhi by peaceful means then if the cause for what they are fighting is right then they do not have to get killed to get freedom. But the separatists leaders know that majority is not with them because few district do not constitute whole of Jammu and Kashmir state as map on top shows the valley constitute only small area which can fit into Ladahak district and also 100% of Kashmiri Pundit's are not with this concept of so called azaadi.

God Made Heaven And Man made it Hell

 Genesis of all the ills of Kashmir Lies on the door step of Pakistan. In India there is vibrant democracy which provides opporunity for every one opinion to florish. India is the only country in the world where communist have come to power through the ballot and not by bullets. I don't see any reason for Kashmiri not able to florish under Indian Constitution. The army of Pakistan is a fat cat able to survive only on one issue that is Kashmir. If at all any resolution is found within political leaders then people of Pakistan will ask where is the need for such huge budget for Pakistan army  needed as for their defence they have got nuclear bombs hence they are surviving because they want Kashmir pot boiling. Since Pakistan could not get Kashmir with all their means so they started Terrorrism under the policy of giving thousand of cuts to Indian State by way training and providing support fianancial as well as diplomatic. However after 9/11 U.S. i.e. world opinion changed now they could not support Terorism in form of freedom fighters and this did not yield desired result since 1990 thousamds of so called freedom fighter lost life so they changed the strategy and borrowed the concept of  Palestine i.e Intifida loosely translated "Up rising" . Now they using young boys as cannon fodder this suits Pakistan as economical as well as high degree of visibility in International arena.

Kashmir Historical Perspective

At the time of independance Jammu and Kashmir was not directly ruled by British but was governed by Hindu Maharaja ruling over majority muslim. As per formula under which India got the Independance from the British the option was left to the Ruler who was gpverning at that time to decide whether to join Pakistan or India or  remain Independant. However Jammu and Kashmir Maharaja opted to remain independant. However this was not acceptable neither to India nor to  Pakistan. So Pakistan sent Tribals and soliders in civilian clothers attacked on Kashmir to annexe Jammu and Kashmir they quickly overpowered the army of Maharaja and started march towards Srinagar in the mean time Maharaja ran away from Kashmir and he signed accession treaty with India and then only India sent  Indian Army and pushed back invaders. But Nehru went to United Nation over ruling the advise of then Home minister Sardar Patel so cease fire was decalared which as on date is Line of Control (LoC). Now Pakistan Claim that which is controlled by Pakistan as Indpendant Kashmir and which is controlled by India is Indian Occupied Kashmir. To get controll of Jammu and Kashmir Pakistan has waged three wars without any result on top of it Pakistan was further partitioned into two countries as East Pakistan became Bangladesh and West Pakistan became as Pakistan.
Conclusion of this historical perspective is that Jinnah made a historical blunder on carving out a Nation on the principal of Religion as a state Policy which was judged by the history as a monumental blunder. History proved that religion cannot bind Nation also what is the state of Pakistan today. Muslim's are killing there own people and leading to Pakistan becoming on the verge of as a failed state. Since the formation there has been never honorable exit of its Prime Minster/President/ Dictators either there was coup or being assassinated. Pakistan was created by the Jinnah who was not a practicing Muslim as he was fond of Whisky and was eating pork neither he knew Koran. The only reason he created Pakistan was blinding ambition to become a father of Nation the post in India was occupied by Gandhi and he had tough compitition